Q: What employee adoption issues are associated with a new Six Sigma deployment?
A: The most common response from employees deploying Six Sigma is, "Here we go again!" Organizations that pursue improvement opportunities have often used other methodologies. The common question is: "What makes Six Sigma any different from the other initiatives we've tried? Why does this work any better than the programs we already have in place?"
There is often skepticism in the advertised benefits of Six Sigma; average cost savings of $250,000 per project seems like a lot of money, especially when it can add up to billions of dollars saved over several years.
Effective deployments require full-time support from Black Belts, as well as significant time from others supporting Black Belt project teams. Providing those resources, and getting the day-to-day work done without the people deployed to do Six Sigma, often creates anxiety.
A company asked, "Does Six Sigma apply here? It may work if you're building pagers, but what about the kind of work we do?" Even among organizations with similar products and processes as companies that have successfully deployed Six Sigma, there is a strong conviction that they are somehow different so it won't work here.
Without the support of senior leaders, change initiatives are destined to fail. When employees see that their leaders are not providing the resources and necessary support for the deployment, they have an excuse not to support it themselves.
Q: What strategies work well when it comes to training employees and convincing resistant employees to adapt to new ways of working?
A: The ultimate convincer is success achieving the goals and objectives that have been identified by the organization as critical for their continued success. However, just telling stories of successful projects doesn't necessarily get all employees excited about Six Sigma.
At one financial services company, there was significant discussion at the outset of the deployment around the integrity of results. They put financial gates in place to qualify projects that truly created bottom-line results, and then audited the projects one year after completion in order to ensure the results lasted. The audit verified that the results were real. Communicating the criteria surrounding projects and their subsequent success created credibility with those outside of the deployment.
Another company created financial incentives for project results; not just for Champions, Black Belts and their teams, but also for the area where process improvements were made. The entire organization had a piece of variable compensation at risk for Six Sigma results, which created interest and support for the deployment.